Follow by Email

Friday, January 23, 2015


I would like to make a few comments over the hype regarding this film.  I would state up front that my initial gut reaction is that celebrating a sniper is wrong and that the morality of what a sniper does is questionable at best.  It is one thing to shoot at and kill men that are shooting at you and attempting to kill you, it is quite another to shoot a man from 1000 yards away while he is having his morning cup of coffee, but that is neither here nor there regarding the points I would like to make.

Hollywood, specifically the anti-gun, pro-abortion, pro-homosexual Clint Eastwood, is promoting the sniper upon whom this film is based, Kris Kyle, as a hero.  

For me, that was an immediate red flag.  Many of the "conservatives" are promoting this film as pro-american and supporting conservative values.  I wondered, why would Hollywood, which is anti-gun, pro-abortion, pro-homosexual, etc... be promoting a man that supposedly stands for conservative values.

So I did a little research into this Kris Kyle, the "American Sniper".  Apparently he killed 160 men and is celebrated as having the most kills of any sniper in American history.  I am not sure that is something to celebrate, but I will move on from this.

This man stated many times that he enjoyed killing these men, that he liked "killing brown people" and referred to Arabs as "savages".  He bragged of looting homes and other property.  But some will say that this is just war and to be expected.

Kris Kyle wrote a book that became a best seller.  He and his widow (Kris Kyle was murdered at a gun range here in the USA by another soldier) both claimed that they did not want to profit from the book and were giving the proceeds to Veterans organizations.  This claim turned out to be an outright lie.  Somewhere around 2% of the profits were given to veterans groups, 98% went into their pockets.

Kris Kyle claimed to have been hired by the US Government to snipe looters after Katrina, this claim to has turned out to be false.

Kris Kyle claimed to have shot two carjackers here in the USA, another claim that has no basis in reality.

Kris Kyle claimed to  have met Jesse Ventura in a tavern and that Jesse Ventura was bashing veterans so  he punched him in the face.  Jesse Venture completely denied this and a lawsuit was filed and Ventura won millions. 

This man was a psychotic liar and likely enjoyed killing and merely found a legal way to do it.  He probably would have been a serial killer had he not become a military sniper.

He is not a hero and even "conservative" publications like the National Review say as much.

here are a few stories about this guy:

Thursday, January 22, 2015

What surprises me is not what this man is saying about anti-pope Francis, he is just stating the obvious to anyone who cares about the truth, what surprises me is that this man can still believe that Francis is a valid Pope and how he can call this heretic his "holy father". This man, John Vennari of Catholic Family News stated that he would not let Francis teach his children religion! Yet he still believes that Francis is a valid Pope! Vatican II "Catholics" amaze me!

Distribution of "Communion" at "Papal Mass" in Manila a few days ago.

I think most of these people show more respect when passing Doritos around than what they supposedly believe to be the Body, Blood, Soul, and Divinity of Jesus Christ!
Republican Bill To Allow Creationism In Indiana Classrooms, Says Critic
Good! The word "science" comes from the Latin word: "scientia" which means "knowledge" - the root of which is "to know". Knowledge implies knowledge of the truth. One cannot find the truth if the search is limited or certain areas of this search are banned. The science that holds to special design and creation is just as much (I would argue much more so) than evolutionism. And time and time again, when a true creation scientist debates an evolutionist head to head, the creationist destroys the evolutionist. (the exception would be the ridiculous debate between the two idiots - Bill Nye and Ken Ham).

Here is a debate featuring Kent Hovind, a creationist against 3 professors and scientists who hold the theory of evolution. It is a very informative and entertaining debate and the winner is CLEAR: 

Tuesday, January 20, 2015

This anti-union card is spot on!

Sadly, I know a few dolts who should be printing this card, signing it, and handing it to their employer!
Majority of U.S. public school students are in poverty

For the first time in at least 50 years, a majority of U.S. public school students come from low-income families, according to a new analysis of 2013 federal data, a statistic that has profound implications for the nation.

The Southern Education Foundation reports that 51 percent of students in pre-kindergarten through 12th grade in the 2012-2013 school year were eligible for the federal program that provides free and reduced-price lunches. The lunch program is a rough proxy for poverty, but the explosion in the number of needy children in the nation’s public classrooms is a recent phenomenon that has been gaining attention among educators, public officials and researchers...

The article states that 51% of public school students are on some form of government aid. The neo-cons will complain about the fact that so many people are on "welfare", but what they are failing to see is that in reality, this is corporate welfare. If wages and benefits were where they should be, the majority of these people would not be receiving benefits! While business' are making record profits, while pay, bonuses and benefits for CEOs and top level management is at an all time high, workers are not paid enough to survive without government aid!

As I see it, a true conservative would totally support Labor Unions as part of a free economy. Free enterprise is in large part based on contractual agreements, so why would a "conservative" oppose a contractual agreement between labor and business? Labor Unions usually create a better standard of living for the workers, thereby giving them more power to own private property (freedom). They also create a middle class that is not dependent on the government for aid and assistance. A true conservative would not only not oppose labor unions, they would support them and defend their rights to contractual agreements (collective bargaining).

Monday, January 19, 2015

‘This is rape, by definition’: UK is giving 10-year-olds contraceptive implants, records show

British girls as young as 10 are being injected with long-lasting contraceptive implants untested on anyone under 18—on the taxpayers dime.

Pro-life and pro-family organizations have spoken out against the revelations, brought to light through freedom-of-information enquiries by the Daily Mail, on the grounds they encourage the exploitation of underage girls for sexual purposes.

“Doctors who do this think they are helping the young girls deal with their own sexually active lives but they are actually part of the problem, by encouraging their sexualization and the sexualization of the culture,” Paul Tully, general secretary of the Society for the Protection of Unborn Children, told LifeSiteNews.

Norman Wells of the Family Education Trust agreed. He told the Daily Mail, “Fitting young girls with contraceptive implants is quite simply indefensible. It is giving them the green light to engage in illegal sexual activity and robbing them of the protection that the age of consent law is intended to give.” The age of consent is 16.

And Dr. Donna Harrison, executive director of the American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, told LifeSiteNews that under no circumstances should a 10-year-old be enabled to continue sexual activities. “A sexually active ten-year-old is being abused, by definition. Ten-year-olds can't give informed consent, and certainly can't give consent for sexual activity.”...

Like I have said for a long time, now that society has accepted the perversion of homosexuality - soon it will accept pedophilia. The morons who support homosexual "rights" say that I am crazy and wrong. They are blinded by their own pride and ignorance. Look at the sexualization of children in society today. from TV shows like Toddlers in Tiaras, to Ambercrombie and Fitch marketing underwear to pre-teen girls that had sayings on them like "eye candy"! Look in the toy isle of any department store and pay attention to the dolls marketed to little girls, look how they are dressed and what type of woman these dolls are representing. People really need to wake the hell up and realize that when one perversion is accepted, others will soon follow - it never ends.

Sunday, January 18, 2015

Lesbian premier orders Ontario’s sex-ed update to teach kids about giving sexual ‘consent’ from ‘the very earliest stages’

Ontario’s lesbian Premier, Kathleen Wynne, has specifically requested that the proposed sex-education curriculum slated for all schools next fall include a component teaching kids about giving sexual “consent” from “the very earliest stages.”

Wynne asked the Ministry of Education to “finalize a new health and physical education curriculum that gets at some of the root causes of gender inequality, and starts at the very earliest stages to develop an understanding of healthy relationships and consent,” according to a communication obtained by The Star.

The curriculum was first revealed in 2010 by the then-McGuinty government and immediately buried after a province-wide uprising of concerned parents. The curriculum would have taught children to question their male/female identity, about oral and anal sex, masturbation, and experimental family structures.

Critics said the curriculum, which was developed during the time Wynne served as education minister, contained an explicit homosexual agenda that normalized homosexual activity and relationships. Their concerns about the explicit program were bolstered when the province’s former deputy minister of education Dr. Ben Levin — who oversaw the development of the sex-ed curriculum — was arrested in 2013 in the wake of an international child pornography and child exploitation sting. Levin was charged with making and distributing child pornography as well as arranging for a sexual offense with a child.

Gwen Landolt, national vice-president of REAL Women of Canada, told LifeSiteNews that teaching children about giving consent “presupposes that sexual activity even at the ‘earliest ages’ is alright, providing that you consent.”

Landolt called the sex-ed 'consent' add-on “very worrisome” since it could eventually lead to adults having “access to children, providing the children give their consent.”

“You have the question about the exploitation of adults and young children. You also have the question about homosexuals, namely will this allow them to have access to children, providing the children give their consent?” she said.

Some homosexual activist organizations have worked to lower the legal age whereby a person can give sexual consent as well as normalize adult-child sex. What the average citizen calls pedophilia is called in some homosexual circles an “intergenerational romance” for “minor-attracted adults.”

At a 2011 U.S. conference organized by homosexual group B4U-ACT, activists asserted that “children are not inherently unable to consent” to sex with an adult, that “minor-attracted persons” are “unfairly stigmatized and demonized” by society, and that an adult’s desire to have sex with children is “normative.”

Dr. Judith Reisman, a professor at Liberty University School of Law, told LifeSiteNews that “pedosadists” within the homosexual movement are moving to “lower the age of consent and to teach children that it is OK for them to consent to having sex with adults.”

“The whole issue is to make children available for sex earlier. The younger the child can give consent, the quicker you can have sex with them that is legal,” she said.
Reisman said Wynne’s sex-ed proposals should be named the “Ben Levin program of sex-education.”

The Ontario Physical and Health Education Association (Ophea), which partners with homosexual organizations such as Queer Ontario and Jer’s Vision, said it was pleased to hear of the adding of a “consent” component to the proposed sex-ed. Ophea executive director Chris Markham told The Star that his group had been “asking for the ministry to look at consent as part of the revision process.”
LifeSiteNews contacted Minister of Education Liz Sandals asking what the ministry envisions by teaching children about how to give sexual consent, but received only a generalized, pre-written response.

A draft of the sex-ed is scheduled to be released in the next two months, The Star reported.

One perversion leads to another. Homosexuality and pedophilia are linked. The International Lesbian and Gay Association (a worldwide homosexual rights organization with United Nations consulting status) supported NAMBLA (National Man Boy Love Association), a group of homosexuals who seek to eliminate age of consent laws. A Christian group discovered that ILGA and virtually ALL homosexual rights organizations supported NAMBLA and exposed it and after much effort got the attention of a few congressman and the media. Since the exposure these groups no longer openly support NAMBLA, but as can be seen by this article, the homosexual rights groups are still active in promoting pedophilia.

Saturday, January 17, 2015

It happened in 2013, but I just heard of it. The customs officials wondered why he would bring diseased leaves into the nation.

Can you figure it out?

 How many other Jews are trying to spread diseases or insects?

Friday, January 16, 2015

This is spot on, especially when considering the bogus theory of evolution, global warming, the effectiveness of vaccinations, etc...

The late Dr. Michael Crichton in a speech at the California Institute of Technology made the following observation:

“I want to …talk about … the rise of what has been called consensus science. I regard consensus science as an extremely pernicious development that ought to be stopped cold in its tracks.
Historically, the claim of consensus has been the first refuge of scoundrels; it is a way to avoid debate by claiming that the matter is already settled. …

“Let’s be clear: the work of science has nothing whatever to do with consensus. Consensus is the business of politics. Science, on the contrary, requires only one investigator who happens to be right, which means that he or she has results that are verifiable by reference to the real world. In science consensus is irrelevant. What is relevant is reproducible results … .

“There is no such thing as consensus science. If it’s consensus, it isn’t science. If it’s science, it isn’t consensus. … .”  … Consensus is invoked only in situations where the science is not solid enough. Nobody says the consensus of scientists agrees that E = mc². Nobody says the consensus is that the sun is 93 million miles away. It would never occur to anyone to speak that way.”